<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breast biopsy: One type is much safer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/01/22/breast-biopsy-one-type-is-much-safer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/01/22/breast-biopsy-one-type-is-much-safer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni Goldfarb</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/01/22/breast-biopsy-one-type-is-much-safer/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni Goldfarb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/01/25/breast-biopsy-techniques-which-is-best/#comment-646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryann, once again you&#039;re ahead of the pack on diagnosis and treatment of breast &quot;abnormalities.&quot; Thanks for all you&#039;re doing to save women from unnecessary procedures.
--Toni Goldfarb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maryann, once again you&#8217;re ahead of the pack on diagnosis and treatment of breast &#8220;abnormalities.&#8221; Thanks for all you&#8217;re doing to save women from unnecessary procedures.<br />
&#8211;Toni Goldfarb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

