<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; flu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicalconsumers.org/tag/flu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicalconsumers.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='medicalconsumers.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://medicalconsumers.org/osd.xml" title="" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://medicalconsumers.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>WHO &amp; Pharma under fire over swine flu</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/04/02/who-pharma-draw-fire-over-swine-flu/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/04/02/who-pharma-draw-fire-over-swine-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faux pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHARMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamiflu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/?p=4829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the faux swine flu pandemic fades from memory, consider this: One country---Poland---made the decision not to knuckle under to the pharmaceutical industry and buy H1N1 swine flu vaccines for its citizens. Dr. Ewa Kopacz, who is Poland’s minister of health, refused to launch a national vaccination campaign for several good reasons, not the least of which was moderate nature of the H1N1 flu in the countries of the southern hemisphere.  But it was the “conditions of purchase” that sealed her refusal. She was told by the vaccine companies that only the government could purchase their products----vaccines would not be sold to clinics, or anyone in Poland. The price of each vaccine would be two to three times the cost of the yearly seasonal vaccine, though Dr. Kopacz knew the H1N1 vaccine is based on exactly the same technology.  What’s more, it was not known at the time whether people would need one or two vaccines for full protection. And most outrageous: the Polish government was expected to sign a contract, stating that anyone injured by a vaccine would be the government’s responsibility.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=4829&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/04/02/who-pharma-draw-fire-over-swine-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://coenews.coe.int/vod/100329_w01_w.wmv" length="0" type="video/asf" />
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine flu hysteria</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chronic Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu hysteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world health organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As time went on, we learned that everyone born before 1957 has natural immunity so they don’t need the vaccine. This is a startling public health about-face. Haven’t we always been told that vaccines are equal to or better than natural immunity—that is, getting the flu naturally? “It is a false assumption that the vaccine provides similar immunity to the natural infection. We have evidence that the natural infection provides long-term immunity for more than 50 years. We don’t know how long the vaccine-induced immunity lasts, but estimates are two to three years at best,” explained researcher, Jim Wright, MD, in response to an e-mail inquiry.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=3884&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How good is Tamiflu?</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/28/how-good-is-tamiflu/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/28/how-good-is-tamiflu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockpiling Tamiflu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamiflu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamiflu complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamiflu modest effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamiflu risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/?p=3177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When flu symptoms develop, you are not likely to know whether you have influenza A or B; nor will there be much time for laboratory confirmation. (The test is highly inaccurate anyway.) Chances are high that you don’t have influenza A or B because both are relatively rare, representing less than 10% of circulating viruses. What’s more, the symptoms are indistinguishable from the other 90% of circulating viruses that cause what is known as influenza-like illness. H1N1, or swine flu, is an influenza A virus, which is why this drug is allowed to be marketed for seasonal as well as H1N1 influenza.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=3177&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/28/how-good-is-tamiflu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the swine flu isn&#8217;t a major threat</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal flu vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "I am aware of only one published study [regarding an H1N1 vaccine]. It appeared recently in the <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMoa0907413">online version [September 11, 2009] of the New England Journal of Medicine</a>. I have four problems with this study, which was done in Australia. 1) It was tiny, only 240 adults.  The authors made reassuring statements about <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/guillain-barr-syndrome">Guillain–Barré syndrome</a>, which is ridiculous because GBS occurs in one out of 750,000 to 1 million vaccinations, and this study only had 240 participants; 2) one third of these volunteers had side effects that resembled influenza-like illness (headaches, sore throats, etc.), so they were vaccinating to prevent symptoms that they were causing;  3) there was no placebo arm in the study [a group that was injected with an inert vaccine], yet there’s no ethical excuse for not having a placebo arm because these are experimental vaccines;  and 4) the description of what additive substances were in the vaccine was unclear. We know that there is thimerosal [mercury] in this H1N1 vaccine, but its manufacturer did not say whether there are additional substances like aluminum, which can be found in many other vaccines. We just don’t know.  And they are advising this vaccine for pregnant women and children over six months of age!" <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=3088&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flu Vaccines Do Not Work For Kids Or The Elderly</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2005/03/01/flu-vaccines-do-not-work-for-kids-or-the-elderly/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2005/03/01/flu-vaccines-do-not-work-for-kids-or-the-elderly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Men's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medconsumers.wordpress.com/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flu vaccines provide virtually no benefit to children. That's the conclusion of a new review of all relevant studies. Interestingly, the news comes at a time when some health officials have begun to recommend the vaccination of all children in order to prevent them from passing on the flu to their elderly relatives.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=902&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2005/03/01/flu-vaccines-do-not-work-for-kids-or-the-elderly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
