<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; vaccines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicalconsumers.org/tag/vaccines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicalconsumers.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='medicalconsumers.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://medicalconsumers.org/osd.xml" title="" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://medicalconsumers.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Flu death risk overrated</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/03/22/4741/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/03/22/4741/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the final death count on the pandemic that wasn’t.  An estimated 12,000 Americans died from the H1N1 swine flu between April 2009 (when it first emerged) and March 12, 2010, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Out of the American population of over 315 million, this number of swine flu deaths is pretty low on the list of things likely to kill us before our time. (The majority of flu-related deaths occur in people over age 65.) Swine flu proved to be much less lethal than the ordinary seasonal flu that accounts for an estimated 36,000 deaths, which has long been the yearly estimate from the CDC. There are several reasons why the CDC must use estimates. Among them: laboratory-confirmed deaths are uncommon because people die at home or they die in the hospital of influenza complications (e.g., pneumonia, congestive heart failure) and the virus has left the body by the time the death occurs. We don't even know how many deaths occurred among people who were vaccinated.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=4741&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2010/03/22/4741/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine flu hysteria</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chronic Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu hysteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world health organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As time went on, we learned that everyone born before 1957 has natural immunity so they don’t need the vaccine. This is a startling public health about-face. Haven’t we always been told that vaccines are equal to or better than natural immunity—that is, getting the flu naturally? “It is a false assumption that the vaccine provides similar immunity to the natural infection. We have evidence that the natural infection provides long-term immunity for more than 50 years. We don’t know how long the vaccine-induced immunity lasts, but estimates are two to three years at best,” explained researcher, Jim Wright, MD, in response to an e-mail inquiry.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=3884&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/12/04/swine-flu-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the swine flu isn&#8217;t a major threat</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal flu vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalconsumers.org/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "I am aware of only one published study [regarding an H1N1 vaccine]. It appeared recently in the <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMoa0907413">online version [September 11, 2009] of the New England Journal of Medicine</a>. I have four problems with this study, which was done in Australia. 1) It was tiny, only 240 adults.  The authors made reassuring statements about <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/guillain-barr-syndrome">Guillain–Barré syndrome</a>, which is ridiculous because GBS occurs in one out of 750,000 to 1 million vaccinations, and this study only had 240 participants; 2) one third of these volunteers had side effects that resembled influenza-like illness (headaches, sore throats, etc.), so they were vaccinating to prevent symptoms that they were causing;  3) there was no placebo arm in the study [a group that was injected with an inert vaccine], yet there’s no ethical excuse for not having a placebo arm because these are experimental vaccines;  and 4) the description of what additive substances were in the vaccine was unclear. We know that there is thimerosal [mercury] in this H1N1 vaccine, but its manufacturer did not say whether there are additional substances like aluminum, which can be found in many other vaccines. We just don’t know.  And they are advising this vaccine for pregnant women and children over six months of age!" <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=3088&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2009/09/24/why-the-h1n1-virus-is-not-a-major-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Ubiquitous Gardasil Ads</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/03/01/those-ubiquitous-gardasil-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/03/01/those-ubiquitous-gardasil-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medconsumers.wordpress.com/?p=2105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first thing you notice about the Gardasil TV ads, featuring teen-age girls engage in various athletic activities, is that there is no mention of the fact that the Gardasil vaccine is for the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=2105&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/03/01/those-ubiquitous-gardasil-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Vaccine Policy is Made: The Story of Merck and Gardasil</title>
		<link>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/02/01/how-vaccine-policy-is-made-the-story-of-merck-and-gardasil/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/02/01/how-vaccine-policy-is-made-the-story-of-merck-and-gardasil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>medconsumers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medconsumers.wordpress.com/?p=2111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much has happened since the November HealthFacts took the position that the new cervical cancer vaccine should not be mandated. By now, most of the U.S. is probably aware that donations from Merck, maker of the Gardasil vaccine, influenced Governor Rick Perry’s decision to make Texas the first state to mandate Gardasil vaccinations for all girls entering the sixth grade.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=medicalconsumers.org&amp;blog=7088906&amp;post=2111&amp;subd=medconsumers&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalconsumers.org/2007/02/01/how-vaccine-policy-is-made-the-story-of-merck-and-gardasil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Maryann</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
